ORD 1067 08/02/2013 Ay , NO
•
a•v `J ' *
s .
rex p5
"City of Choice"
ORDINANCE NO. 1067
AN ORDINANCE UPDATING AND AMENDING THE CITY OF CIBOLO WATER,
WASTEWATER, DRAINAGE AND TRANSPORATION IMPACT FEE PROGRAMS
BY ADOPTING UPDATED LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS, ADOPTING AN UPDATED
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN; REVISING THE IMPACT FEE SERVICE
AREA BOUNDARIES AND ADOPTING THE 2013 IMPACT FEE STUDY 2013
UPDATE; AND BY AMENDING THE WATER, WASTEWATER, DRAINAGE AND
TRANSPORTATION IMPACT FEES TO BE CHARGED BY THE CITY OF
CIBOLO; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR SAVINGS AND
REPEAL; PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Cibolo, Texas (the "City Council") has
previously passed Ordinance No. 811 adopting Land Use Assumptions ("LUA") and a Capital
Improvement Plan("CIP"); and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Cibolo, Texas (the "City Council") has
previously passed Ordinance No. 866 adopting impact fees for Water, Wastewater and
Drainage ("Impact Fees"); and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Cibolo, Texas (the "City Council") has
previously passed Ordinance No. 881 adopting an impact fee for Transportation ("Impact
Fees"); and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Cibolo, Texas (the "City Council") has
previously passed Ordinance No. 1025 on September 11, 2012 adopting the 2012-2017 City
of Cibolo 5-Year Capital Improvements Plan; and
WHEREAS, the City has caused its existing Land Use Assumptions, Impact Fee Service
Area and 5-Year 2012-2017 Capital Improvements Plan to be reviewed by the Capital
Improvements Plan Advisory Committee on April 10, 2013, and reviewed by City Council on
May 20, 2013; and
WHEREAS, the City has caused its existing Land Use Assumptions, Impact Fee Service
Area and 5-Year 2012-2017 Capital Improvements Plan to be reviewed, evaluated and
updated by qualified professionals using generally accepted engineering and planning
practices in accordance with the provisions of Subchapter B of Chapter 395 of the Texas
Local Government Code; and
Page 1
WHEREAS, such updates to the Land Use Assumptions, Impact Fee Service Area and 5-
Year 2012=2017 Capital Improvements Plan necessitate an increase in the water, wastewater,
drainage and transportation impact fees in order to implement and fund the expenses of
constructing capital improvements and facility expansions in accordance withthe provisions
of Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code; and
WHEREAS, the City's consultants have prepared .a document titled "Impact Fee Study
2013 Update, Water, Wastewater, Drainage and Transportation", dated July 1, 2013,
attached hereto as Exhibit A to this ordinance updating the Impact Fee Studies adopted by
Ordinances 811 and 866 in 2007 for Water Systems, Wastewater Systems, Drainage Systems
and Transportation Systems; and
WHEREAS, The City of Cibolo ("City") has fully complied with Chapter 395, Texas Local
Government Code, with regards to notice, adoption, promulgation and methodology as
required for creation and adoption of the updated Land Use Assumptions, Impact Fee Service
Area and 5-Year 2012-2017 Cibolo Capital Improvements Plan; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 395.056, Texas Local Government Code, the CIP Advisory
Committee has filed written comments on the proposed amendments, to the Land Use
Assumptions, Impact Fee Service Area and 5-Year 2012-2017 Cibolo Capital Improvements
Plan;before the 5th day before the date of the public hearing on the amendments; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the updated and amended Land Use
Assumptions, Impact Fee Service Area, 5-Year 2012-2017 Cibolo Capital Improvements Plan
and each impact fee study referenced above and held a public hearing on August 13, 2013 to
receive public input on the proposed updates and amendments to the Land Use Assumptions,
Impact Fee Service Area, 5-Year 2012-2017 Cibolo Capital Improvements Plan and each
impact fee study; and
WHEREAS, the proposed updates and amendments to the updated and amended Land Use
Assumptions, Impact Fee Service Area, 5-Year 2012-2017 Cibolo Capital Improvements Plan
and each impact fee study were made available to the public; and
WHEREAS, the City Council hereby finds and determines that it is in the best interest of the
health and welfare of the citizens of Cibolo to approve the updated Land Use Assumptions,
Impact Fee Service Area, 5-Year 2012-2017 Cibolo Capital Improvements Plan and each
impactfee study.
NOW THEREFORE:
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CIBOLO,TEXAS:
Part 1. Water Impact Fee Program. The City Council amends the City's Water Impact Fee
Program by adopting:
(1) the area described in the City's Certificate of Convenience and Necessity
(CCN) for water service, as identified in the "Impact Fee Study 2013 Update,
Page 2
Water, Wastewater, Drainage and Transportation" (Exhibit A) of this
ordinance, as the City's Water Service Area;
(2) the Land Use Assumptions described in of the "Impact Fee Study 2013
Update,Water,Wastewater,Drainage and Transportation" (Exhibit A);
(3) the Impact Fee Capital Improvements Plan, described in the "Impact Fee
Study 2013 Update, Water, Wastewater, Drainage and Transportation"
(Exhibit A) ; and
(4) a Water Impact Fee of $3,595.00 per living unit equivalent (LUE) on new
development within the Water Service Area described in the "Impact Fee
Study 2013 Update, Water, Wastewater, Drainage and Transportation"
(Exhibit A).
Part 2. Wastewater Impact Fee Program. The City Council amends the City's Wastewater
Impact Fee Program by adopting:
(1) the area described in the City's Certificate of Convenience and Necessity
(CCN) for wastewater service, as identified in the "Impact Fee Study 2013
Update,Water,Wastewater, Drainage and Transportation" (Exhibit A) of
this ordinance, as the City's:Wastewater Service Area
(2) the Land Use Assumptions described in of the "Impact Fee Study 2013
Update,Water,Wastewater,Drainage and Transportation" (Exhibit A);
(3) . the Impact Fee Capital Improvements Plan, described in the "Impact Fee
Study 2013 Update, Water, Wastewater, Drainage and Transportation"
(Exhibit A); and
(4) a Wastewater Impact Fee of$1,770.00 per living unit equivalent(LUE) on new
development within the Waste Water Service Area described in the "Impact
Fee Study 2013 Update,Water,Wastewater,Drainage and Transportation"
(Exhibit A).
Part 3. Drainage Impact Fee Program. The City Council amends the City's Drainage
Impact Fee Program by adopting:
(1) the watersheds; as described in the "Impact Fee Study 2013 Update, Water,
Wastewater, Drainage and Transportation" (Exhibit A) as the City's
Drainage Service Area;
(2) the Land Use Assumptionsdescribed in the "Impact Fee Study 2013 Update,
Water,Wastewater,Drainage and Transportation" (Exhibit A);
(3) the Impact Fee Capital Improvements Plan, described in the "Impact Fee
Study 2013 Update, Water, Wastewater, Drainage and Transportation"
(Exhibit A); and
(4) a Drainage Impact Fee in the amount of$1,015.00 per living unit equivalent
(LUE) oh new development within the:Drainage Service Area described in the
Page 3
"Impact Fee Study 2013 Update, Water, Wastewater, Drainage and
Transportation" (Exhibit A).
Part 4. Transportation Impact_ Fee Program. The City Council amends the City's
Transportation Impact Fee Program by adopting:
(1) the Transportation Service Area, consisting of the North Zone and the South
Zone, as described in the "Impact Fee Study 2013 Update, Water,
Wastewater,. Drainage and Transportation" (Exhibit A) as the
Transportation Service Area;
(2) the Land Use Assumptions described in the "Impact Fee Study 2013 Update,
Water,Wastewater,Drainage and Transportation" (Exhibit A):
(3) the Impact Fee Capital Improvements Plan, described in the "Impact Fee
Study 2013 Update, Water, Wastewater, Drainage and Transportation"
(Exhibit A); and
(4) Transportation Impact Fees in the amount of $1,090.00 per living unit
equivalent (LUE) on new development within the North Zone of the
Transportation Service Area, and $1,940.00 per LUE on new development
within the South Zone of the Transportation Service Area, as described in the
"Impact Fee Study 2013 Update, Water, Wastewater, Drainage and
Transportation" (Exhibit A).
Part 5. Assessment and Collection of Impact Fees. Impact Fees shall be assessed and
collected in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government
Code, as the same may be amended from time to time. The City Manager, or his designee, is
hereby authorized to develop procedures and policies for assessment and collection of impact
fees consistent with applicable law and the City's ordinances, and to implement said
procedures and policies in the administration of the City's Transportation Impact Fee
Program.
Part 6. Agreement with Owner. 'This ordinance does not prohibit the City from entering
into an agreement with the owner of a tract of land for which the plat has been recorded
providing for the time and method of payments of the impact fees or an agreement for a
reduction or waiver of fees.
Part 7. Acceptance of Fees. The City is under no obligation to accept offered impact fees.
This ordinance creates no obligation for the City to serve any property Within the City.
Part 8. Imposition of Additional Fees. This ordinance shall not limit the City's authority to
impose other or additional impact fees authorized by Chapter 395 of the Texas Local
Government Code, or to impose taxes, fees, charges or assessments authorized by state law.
Part 9. Attachments. Exhibit A referenced above is incorporated into this ordinance.
Part 10. Repealer. Any prior ordinance or parts of ordinances that are in force when this
ordinance becomes effective, and which conflict with the provisions of this ordinance, are
hereby repealed to the.extent of the conflict.
Page 4
Part 11. Severance. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance
is for any reason, held to be unconstitutional or invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction,
such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance.
Part 12. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall becomeeffective after having been published
twice in the official newspaper of the City.
PASSED AND APPROVED this,the 27th day of August 2013.
J Ter H man, Mayor.
ATTEST:
Peggy Cimics, City Secretary
Page 5
EXHIBIT A
"IMPACT FEE STUDY 2013 UPDATE,WATER,WASTEWATER,DRAINAGE AND
TRANSPORTATION"
(Attached)
Page 6
RPS Espey
City of Cibolo
Impact Fee Study 2013 Update
Water, Wastewater, Drainage, and Transportation
Date Submitted:.July 2013
Client: City of Cibolo
Project Number: 13001.00
1
I t.
- { — �£ s r,
-- :7" --•*-..:.'' 0 - * ''' * 4k%.0,,,, ; 4:*:-
k$31. , ._
r /ff-
Irl
' Ofrr -
to ,' 1(;
I
I '4
.,,,s.c.ill,:n.tie... ___, *Ii, ,r..„.„. i l _I , - b..&.:„. F , -7.(4-.7-:',J , :‘ , 1 t' :,
r.
4'7 r
: ._ • "- _
.....:20,114' .
14
- .,., t/ `.. J ,
rpsgroup.com
CITY OF CIBOLO—IMPACT FEE STUDY-2013 UPDATE
Water, Wastewater, Drainage, and Transportation
TETAI,
...... ......
1,.. •••
Prepared for: 1*1
City of Cibolo
DAL " ' RAY
200 S. Main Street 40* '•3133 %dr
14i•
Cibolo, Texas 78108 4IC E SV#44,
%•tikii"*.1114.Viell
By:
RPS Espey Project No. 13001:00
4801 Southwest Parkway
Parlway 2, Suite 150
Austin,Texas 78735
T(512)326-5659
F(512) 32645723
www.rpsaroup.com
, .
City of Cibolo July 1,2013
Impact Fee Study 2013 Update-Water,Wastewater, Drainage, and Transportation
Table of Contents
Introduction 1
1.1 Executive Summary 1
1.2 Periodic Update Required 1
2 Impact Fee Summaries 2
2.1 Water 2
2.1.1 Description of the Water Planning Area 2
2.2 Wastewater 4
2.2.1 Description of the Wastewater Planning Area 4
2.3 Drainage 6
2.3.1 Description of the.Drainage.Planning Area 6
2.4 Transportation 7
2.4.1 •Description of the Transportation Planning Area 7
3 Methodology 9
3.1 CIP Development 9
3.1.1 Capital Improvements Advisory Committee 9
3.1.2 Planning Meetings 10
3.2 Update Assumptions Map 10
3.2.1 Future Land Use Plan Update 10
3.2.2 Future Land Use Assumptions Map Update 10
3.3 Living Unit Equivalency Calculations 10
3.3.1 Water 11
3.3.2 Wastewater 12
3.3.3 Drainage, 13
3.3.4 Transportation 13
4 Implementation 15
4.1 Comparison with Surrounding Communities 15
4.2 Steps for Adoption 15
City of Cibolo July 1,2013
Impact.Fee Study 2013 Update-Water,Wastewater, Drainage,Transportation .
Appendix A— Future Land Use Assumptions Map A
Appendix B Project Maps A
Appendix C — Impact Fee Tables A
Appendix D — Digital Data A
List of Figures
Figure 1:. Water Planning.Area 3
Figure 2: Wastewater Planning Area . . _ 5
Figure 3: Town Creek Watershed 6
Figure 4: Transportation Planning Area 8
List Of Tables
Table 3.1:Water Land Use Equivalency Table .. . 12
Table 3.2: Wastewater Land Use Equivalency Table 12
Table 3.3: Drainage Land Use-Equivalency Table . . 13
Table 3.4: Average Trip Generations Table' 14
Table 4.1: Impact Fee Comparison Table 1.5
Page 2 of 2
City of Cibolo July 1,2013
Impact Fee Study 2013 Update—Water,Wastewater, Drainage,Transportation -
1 Introduction
1.1 Executive Summary
This 2013 Water, Wastewater, Drainage, and Transportation Impact Fee Study for the City of
Cibolo has been developed to update the fees established in 2008. This update serves to
anticipate capital project needs and determine impact fees for the 2013-2023 ten-year statutory
planning period. This plan was developed by RPS Espey Consultants,. Inc. with guidance from
City staff and the Impact Fee Advisory Committeeappointed by City Council. The plan should
be reviewed and updated on an annual basis, in connection with updates to the City Master
Plan or other planning documents, or as needed to reflect changing conditions.
1.2 Periodic Update Required
Per Texas Local Government Code Chapter 395 Section 052, a periodicupdate of Land Use
Assumptions and Capital Improvements Plan is required.
a) A political subdivision imposing an impact fee shall update_the land use assumptions
and capital improvements-plan at least every five years. The initial five-year period
begins on the day the capital improvements plan is adopted.
b) The political-subdivision shall review and evaluate its current land use-assumptions and
shall cause an update of the capital improvements planto be prepared in accordance.
with Subchapter B.
Page 1
City of Cibolo July 1,2013
Impact Fee Study 2013 Update-Water,Wastewater, Drainage,Transportation
2 Impact Fee Summaries
2.1 Water
There are currently 6,141 Living Unit Equivalents (LUEs) in the City's Water Service Area.
Future land use assumptions and anticipated population growth were revised and updated to
guide the future system improvement needs. There will be 12,366 LUEs in the City's Water
Service Area by 2023. Based on land use assumptions and work done by the Capital
Improvement Project (CIP) advisory committee, $46,013,976 in Capital Improvement Projects
are necessary to accommodate the additional 6,225 LUEs attributable to growth. The impact
fee below Includes eligible finance costs as allowed under Local Government Code (LGC)
395.012(b) and the alternative 50% credit described under LGC 395.014(7)(B). A project
location map can be found in Appendix B and the water impact fee table that shows the
calculation can be found in Appendix C.
The Impact fee per water LUE is calculated to be$3,595.
2.1.1 Description of the Water Planning Area
For the purposes of this study, the planning area is defined by the City's Certificate of
Convenience and Necessity (CCN)1, which is the City's water service area. This area is defined
by jurisdictional and geographic considerations, existing water service, and practical limitations
of service.
The adjacentwater service areas receive service from City of Schertz and Green Valley Special
Utility District (GVSUD). The northern portion of Cibolo's city limits and portions of its ETJ are
actually served by GVSUD. Properties within the GVSUD service area are notsubject to impact
fees assessed by the City of Cibolo. The planning area encompasses an area of 5,596 acres
(8.74 square miles). Figure 1 shows the location of the CCN. and water impact fee service
area.
'The City's CCN for water service is CCN#11903,submitted on March 1, 1986 and created on November 2,2000.
Page 2
City of Cibolo July 1,2013
Impact Fee Study 2013 Update_-Water,Wastewater, Drainage, Transportation..
Figure 1: Water Planning Area
€ ', sem:+- -� -�.e_�`.s� z�+' - "a .. - ?' �. mss t,_ 'ad. .•t., x.
Ce al
�� ar `�5�a ; , m CO ass
' ' ,. ,.� �,: IN .xr � z � �.- - uadalupe_Co .- .73'1,4,7Wa�' a� - r
- �, .,�.`.:;;::::•:; ' Cit sof � `
x ° S-,c§h e 4.24.7.10,CN k,
..,r,....,-"W
i fax$, ,k .:. {I t �,Y="x, :9 �,
<`'2 .7'- "",;,,-r,"fit, _ '}'
pre• •
��^';� =�: war,,m :' ''''1,0 _:r:L':£:°�'•• .��';{•$���f::=::.�' 4':��'1�:,••.. r ..,,,.',7 g. t.
t g
( CR 31C
,y"tea - L:*-:4:•••:::::•!:1::Y:4•-•::•:::::::::.,-.6,1. .-;6'4'.•: :.:..
r
VSs h e r -z C GAN;� :��' -- � max' •��
.,a
. fI� 7 -
4�=
3 ic
• r�
u, s
xu
I•
�v
t �. G r e e-n V a l l e y
az tom ,-
��W 6.e� 3 '
��= fir'
�,�� aw � � �`�• -R. +rte — ,���� t- ' � F
ilk
�^ � 9
I 7°
fieri'
G�`�r o,fw
�:v
i;
Sche=r�t=z:a�CC-N
I 3
i
.,r•
-•t
i.
ro rfid�:�?� 3. G,re.en Valleys'j, ��. •
•, r.;T 1:::::::.. Cibolo.Cit}*;L>mits �,
c k x '"i'.' CibaloR CCN-Boundary&'Service Area
P .i ,i..10•30.50_O,CIPStuWtGlStezh�water_service an_iepu,t.mid: r . •= - ,. - _ -
Page 3
City of Cibolo July 1,2013
Impact Fee Study 2013 Update—Water,Wastewater, Drainage, Transportation_.
2.2 Wastewater
Currently, there are 8,906 LUEs in the City's Wastewater Service Area. Future land use
assumptions and anticipated population growth were revised and updated to guide the future
system improvement needs. There will be 21,817 LUEs in the City's Wastewater Service Area
by 2023. Twenty-three Capital Improvement Projects totaling $45,758,960 are necessary to
accommodate the 12,911 LUEs attributable to growth. The impact fee below includes eligible
finance costs as allowed under LGC 395.012(b) and the alternative 50% credit described under
LGC 395.014(7)(B). A project location map can be found in Appendix. B and the wastewater
impact fee table that shows the calculation can be found in Appendix C.
The Impact fee per wastewater LUE is calculated to be $1,770.
2.2.1 Description of the Wastewater Planning Area
For the purposes of this study, the planning area is defined by the wastewater service area of
the Cibolo Creek Municipal Authority (CCMA) that serves the Cibolo area and is not overlapped
by other surrounding CCNs. This area is defined by jurisdictional and geographic
considerations, existing wastewater service, and practical limitations of service. The planning
area encompasses an area of 10,755 acres (16.8 square miles).
The adjacent areas receive wastewater services from City of Schertz and Green Valley Special
Utility District (GVSUD). Portions of the City's corporate limits and ETJ are served by GVSUD.
Properties within the GVSUD service area are not subject to impact fees assessed by the City
of Cibolo. Figure 2 shows the location of the wastewater impact fee service area.
Page 4
City of Cibolo July 1, 2013
Impact Fee Study 2013 Update—Water,Wastewater, Drainage, Transportation
Figure 2: Wastewater Planning Area
•
Comas Co:
IN 35 Guadalupe Co.
_. - •
City of
Schett:z,. C:CN
4. .
— — —G1I -
g - .: ••,,:......„-:.:.::,...._.„-......„-.„.„......,-..... ,,,,•_,° .' .• • •: .? -.
10,,766 Acres jl`�}�,
City:-.o'f , •
St:h e rtz C•C;N "�
-
F,••:•:•..::•::: Green Mail ey
:.1: .. a. - - - -� „ i
•
i.
,...••� \.
AREAS NOT COVERED:BYA CCN - -
, : ...'.::.:::..l::.:.:i•-•!...:..:....E.;..:1:1...--.1...-:..:.'.1.i•..::::..:,:i I..1:::.:-..1-:,,:,': 1.-..-..:'.......::..?.:-..?.-:'..',... , :,,- : :.'',..*;.:.F:::..2..‘-,,,' - !,-'
. ::
City of Cibolo July 1, 2013
Impact Fee Study 2013 Update—Water,Wastewater, Drainage, Transportation
2.3 Drainage
The purpose of the drainage impact fee is to mitigate flooding from new development
and to provide for downstream conveyance from newly developed portions of Cibolo, to
and through the existing developed and undeveloped areas of Cibolo. There are currently
5,237 LUEs in the Town Creek watershed. Future land use assumptions and anticipated
population growth were revised and updated to guide the future system improvement needs.
Future land use assumptions were established to guide future system improvements needs.
There will be 18,918 LUEs in the City's Town Creek Drainage Service Area by 2023. Seven
Capital Improvement Projects totaling $38,428,233 are necessary to accommodate the 13,681
LUEs attributable to growth. The impact fee below includes eligible finance costs as allowed
under LGC 395.012(b) and the alternative 50% credit described under LGC 395.014(7)(B). A
project location map can be found in Appendix B and the wastewater impact fee table that
shows the calculation can be found in Appendix C.
The Impact fee per drainage LUE is calculated to be $1,015.
2.3.1 Description of the Drainage Planning Area
Figure 3: Town Creek Watershed
For the purposes of this impact fee
study, the planning area is defined by
the Town Creek watershed. This
watershed area is the impact fee service
area or the area in which fees are : , �
omai 35 ou,,,. _I
County
assessed and the CIP is implemented.
The Dietz Creek drainage system, Bracken '
serving the western portion of the City, / STUDY AREA
has been built to capacity. The Santa ' `
10
Clara Creek drainage system is in a
largely undeveloped area of the City of 0►
„niVlr al City
Cibolo and has yet to be fully studied. r ,„, L
iii.
Figure 3 shows the location and extentII,. *
`"'��
ig.1
Ci
of the Drainage impact fee service area.
0 , 2
Mas
Page 6
City of Cibolo July 1,2013
Impact Fee Study 2013 Update-Water,Wastewater, Drainage, Transportation
2.4 Transportation
Currently, there are 20,312 LUEs within city limits of Cibolo or the transportation service area.
Future land use assumptions and anticipated population growth were revised and updated to
guide the future system improvement needs. There will be 64,988 LUEs in the City's
Transportation Service Area by 2023. Twenty-nine Capital Improvement Projects totaling
$186,034,215 are necessary to accommodate the existing and future LUEs. Existing and future
LUEs will benefit from the improvements, and therefore,,the cost is distributed across the total
number of LUE's both existing and projected for the ten-year period. The impact fee below
Includes eligible finance costs as allowed under LGC 395.012(b) and the alternative 50% credit
described under LGC 395.014(7)(B). A project location map can be found in Appendix B and the
transportation impact fee table that shows the calculation can be found in Appendix C.
The impact fee per transportation north zone LUE is calculated to be$1,090.
The impact fee per transportation south zone LUE is calculated to be$1,940.
2.4.1 Description of the Transportation Planning Area
The transportation planning area is defined by the City Limits of Cibolo. Per LGC 395.001(9), for
roadway facilities, the service area is limited to an area within the corporate boundaries of the
political subdivision and shall not exceedsix miles. The transportation impact fee has been split
into two zones, one north of FM 78 and the other south of FM 78, to comply with the
requirement that fees be limited to a six mile area. The planning area encompasses an area of
9,728 acres (15.2 square miles). Figure 4 shows the location of the transportation impact fee
service area.
Page 7
City of Cibolo July 1, 2013
Impact Fee Study 2013 Update—Water, Wastewater, Drainage, Transportation
Figure 4: Transportation Planning Area
® -li
0 2500 5,000 10,000
wilm. Feet
I
Yr
d 1 eneexv
user•o ! �....
r—��.. ....._,_, - L..i
�-- � �rr$�—fI
PN J n = 1+MlDNG1
EJ
-1 O f
4—!
i
FM II.
lir} p
• /7 PFSf t tl 1 o
I ' ..'
j^u.----
61 J
r r.-
,___,,- .
LJ
--„,
BOLTON no
m ) d ',. ______J.
LJ � `
Cibolo City Limits(Transportation CIP Service Area)
Page 8
City of Cibolo July 1,2013
Impact Fee Study 2013 Update—Water,Wastewater, Drainage, Transportation_
3 Methodology
This section describes the methodology applied to the impact fee study for water, wastewater,
drainage, and transportation service within each of the corresponding planning areas. This
includes the development of the CIP by the CIP Advisory Committee, the update to the Future
Land Use Assumptions map, and the calculation of Land Use Equivalencies (LUES) for
developed and undeveloped areas.
3.1 CIP Development
3.1.1 Capital Improvements Advisory Committee
As required by LGC Chapter 395.058, a CIP Advisory Committee was appointed by City Council
in July of 2012. City Council approved the 5-year CIP on September 11, 2012.- The Cibolo CIP
Advisory Committee is comprised of citizens of the City of Cibolo who are members. of the
following standing Boards and Commissions of the City of Cibolo:
• Streets and Drainage Commission
• Planning and Zoning Commission
• Parks and Recreation Commission
• Economic Development Corporation
The members of that Committee are:
• Dick Hetzel, Chairman
• Meghan Bailey, Vice Chair
• Stan Boyle
• Allen Dunn
• Tex Farnsworth
• Pat Evans
• Michael Flores
The ongoing Capital Improvements Advisory Committee will be composed of members from the
Planning and Zoning Commission consistent with Texas Local Government Code.
Page 9
City of Cibolo July 1,2013
Impact Fee Study 2013 Update—Water,Wastewater, Drainage, Transportation
3.1.2 Planning Meetings
The initial planning meeting was an Advisory Committee meeting in 2012. In this meeting, the
Council and City staff discussed past city growth, 2007 CIP list and impact fee report, projected
growth, project priorities and completed CIP projects to this point. From this meeting, a revised
CIP list was compiled.
RPS Espey met with City of Cibolo staff and. Klein Engineering on March 21, 2013 and again
with City of Cibolo staff.and Cobb Fendley, the transportation consultanton this project, on April
18, 2013 to refine the CIP lists by identifying and removing duplicates and completed projects
from the 2008 CIP list, updating cost estimates, and removing projects ineligible for impact fee
funding. This was used as the final list of capital improvements for water, wastewater, drainage
and transportation to be used in the 2013 impact fee study.
3.2 Update Assumptions Map
3.2.1 Future Land Use Plan Update
An update to the Future Land Use and.Thoroughfare Plan was completed and adopted by City
Council on May 14, 2013: This was done prior to reviewing the original land use assumptions
which were utilized to complete the 2008 Impact Fee Study so that the most current vision of
future growth for the City of Cibolo could be used for this analysis.
3.2.2 Future Land Use Assumptions Map Update
On May 15, 2013, the Future Land Use Assumptions Map was sent to the City for final review
-by staff and the CIP Advisory Committee. This map anticipates the growth pattern of the city
and was based on the same considerations as the assumptions used in the 2008 impact fee
studies for the city. An update was needed to the Future Land Use Assumptions due to
changing growth patterns in the city as identified by city staff and the CIP Advisory Committee.
Updates to the Future Land Use-Map were also completed to reflect changes during the interim
five-year period since the completion.of the last study.
3.3 Living Unit Equivalency Calculations
For this study, a Living Unit Equivalency(LUE) is the term used in place of the term service unit
found in the Texas Local Government Code Chapter 395 which describes the standard measure
of consumption, use, generation, or discharge attributable to an individual unit of development.
Page 10
City of Cibolo July 1,2013
Impact Fee Study 2013 Update-Water,Wastewater, Drainage,Transportation
Much of Cibolo can be described as transitioning from rural farmland and large lot residential
uses to more dense single-family development with new mixed-use, cornmercial, and retail
areas serving this residential growth. As a result, areas can easily be classified as being
developed or undeveloped based on the vision of future development as described on the
Future Land Use Map. Existing LUEs were calculated by the same criteria used to calculate
LUEs attributable to future growth for each type of impact fee. Areas that aredeveloped as of
the date of this study are assigned a number of LUEs consistent with the existing land use, and
areas that have not yet been developed are assigned LUEs based on the Future Land Use Map
land use classification and a "probability of development" value.
Land Use Classifications
Residential and non-residential land use classifications are indicated as follows on the
attached copy of the Future Land Use Assumptions Map (Appendix A). Residential uses
indicate the future density in terms of dwelling units per acre or DUA. The land use
classifications include: large lot residential (0-2 DUA) single-family residential (2-6 DUA),
mixed use (6-16 DUA), institutional, commercial, industrial, commercial/industrial, and
park/open space/preserve.
Probability of Development
Since the Future Land Use Assumptions serve as a policy document (the Future Land
Use Plan), the map initially describes a build-out scenario. However, for the purposes of
impact fee calculation, the Future Land Use .Assumptions must reflect the estimated
level of growth in the planning area within the statutory ten-year planning horizon.2 A
probability overlay exercise is undertaken in which each planning:subarea is assigned a
"probability of development" value (between 0.0 and 1.0). These values act as a
coefficient to provide a weighted estimate of future demand at the end of the planning
horizon, thereby avoiding an overestimation of LUEs for each type of impact fee
Tables 3.1, 3.2, 3.3, and 3.4 describe the conversion factors to convert land use classifications
to number of LUEs for water, wastewater, drainage, and transportation.
3.3.1 Water
The calculation of the water impact fee per LUE.was based on conversion factors for each type
of land use. Future land use equivalencies for water service units follow:
2 Texas Local Government Code§395.001(5)
Page 11
City of Cibolo July 1,2013
Impact Fee Study 2013 Update-Water,Wastewater, Drainage, Transportation,
Table 3.1: Water Land Use Equivalency Table
Land Use Classification LUE Conversion
Single-Family 1 Dwelling Unit= 1 LUE
Rural Residential 1 Dwelling Unit= 1 LUE
Commercial' 1 LUE/1660 sf floor area
Commercial/Industrial 1 LUE/2830 sf floor area
Industrial 1 LUE/4.000 sf floor area
Institutional2 2.5 LUE/acre
Mixed Use3 50% Commercial/Retail/Office.
30% Residential
20% Institutional/Public/Civic
Notes:
1) Commercial and industrial development assumes 20%available land area is building
area
2) Institutional use ratio is consistent with other direct methods
3) Mixed use assumes ratio identified in Table 20,City of Cibolo Master Plan
3.3.2 Wastewater
The calculation of the wastewater impact fee per LUEs was based on conversion factors for
each type of land use. Future land use equivalencies for wastewater service units follow:
Table 3.2:Wastewater Land Use Equivalency Table
Land Use Classification LUE Conversion
Single-Family 1 Dwelling Unit= 1 LUE
Rural Residential 1 Dwelling Unit= 1 LUE
Commercial' 1 LUE/1660 sf floor area
Commercial/Industrial 1 LUE/2830 sf floor area
Industrial 1 LUE/4000 sf floor area
Institutional2 2.5 LUE/acre
Mixed Use3 50% Commercial/Retail/Office
30% Residential
20% Institutional/Public/Civic
Notes:
1) Commercial and industrial development assumes 20%available land area is building area
2) Institutional use ratio is consistent with other direct methods
3) Mixed use assumes ratio identified in Table 20,City of Cibolo Master Plan
Page 12
City of Cibolo July 1,2013
Impact Fee Study 2013 Update—Water,Wastewater, Drainage,Transportation..
3.3.3 Drainage
The calculation of drainage impact fees per LUE is based on impervious cover on a typical
single-family lot and-impervious cover percentages for all other land uses are used. Impervious
cover is projected for each area by assuming 3,762 square feet per LUE per the 200,8 drainage
impact study. To determine the amount of impervious cover attributable to .a living unit
equivalency, a typical single-family lot is evaluated. The 3,762 sf of impervious cover per lot
includes surfaces that are placed on the lot, as well as some that are within the right-of-way but
attributable to the unit, such as the driveway apron, curb, and pavement measured to the road
centerlinefor the width of the.property. The impervious cover percentages below are consistent
with current zoning and standard planning practices. Future land use equivalencies for drainage
service units follow:
Table 3.3: Drainage Land Use Equivalency-Table
Land Use Classification LUE Conversion
Single-Family/Rural Residential 1 Dwelling Unit= 1 LUE =3,762 sf impervious cover
Commercial (75% of land area)/3,762 sf= Number of LUEs
Industrial (40% of land area)/3,762 sf= Number of LUEs
Commercial/Industrial (57.5% of land area)/3,762 sf= Number of LUEs
Institutional (20%of land area)./3,762 sf=.Number of LUEs
Mixed.Use (75%of land area)/3,762 sf= Number of LUEs
3.3.4 Transportation
The calculation of transportation impact fees per LUE is equal to a.single family dwelling unit.
Using the Institute of Traffic Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation manuals, trip generation rates
based on land uses are calculated for all areas within the transportation service area, the city
limits. The 9th edition of the ITE trip generation manual is used to determine the rates and lists
the trip generation rate for a single family dwelling unit as 9.52. For all other land uses, trip
generation rates based on predominant land uses in the general land use categories are used.
(i.e. trip generation rates for shopping centers are used for the more general commercial land
use classification): To determine the LUEs for each area, the number of trips calculated for each
area is divided by an average 9.52 vehicle trips per single family household per weekday. Gross
Leasable Area (GLA) is considered to be 20% of land area and Gross Floor Area (GFA) is
considered to be 60% of land area. Future land use equivalencies for transportation service
units follow:
Page 13
City of Cibolo July 1,2013
Impact Fee Study 2013 Update—Water,Wastewater, Drainage,Transportation
Table 3.4: Average Trip Generations Table'
Trip
Specific Land Use for Generation
Future Land Use(General) Trip Generation Rate Unit Rate
Rural.Residential Single-Family Dwelling Units 9.52
Single-Family Single-Family Dwelling Units 9 52
Institutional
Elementary Students(850) 1.29
Middle Students (1500) 1.62
High Students(2800) 1 71
Civic General Office Building GFA 11.03
Industrial Industrial Parks Acres 61.17
Industrial/Commercial Shopping Center GLA 42.7
Commercial Shopping Center GLA 42.7
Park Acre 1.89
Mixed-Use2
Commercial (10%) Shopping Center GLA 42.7
Office (15%) General Office Building GFA 11.03
Retail (25%) Specialty Retail Center GLA 44.32
Public/Civic(10%) average trip generation Acres 1.59
Institutional (10%) average trip generation Acres 14.59
Residential (30%) Single-Family Dwelling Units 9.52
1) Source: Trip Generation, 9th Edition, Volume 2 of 3, Institute of Transportation Engineers, 2012
2) Mixed use assumes ratio identified in Table 20, City of Cibolo Master Plan
Page 14
City of Cibolo July 1,2013
Impact Fee Study 2013 Update-Water,Wastewater, Drainage,Transportation.
4 Implementation
4.1 Comparison with Surrounding Communities
This table provides a point-in-time comparison with impact fees being charged for new
development in surrounding communities as of July 2013. The communities of Austin and San
Marcos are currently in the process of updating their impact fees.
Table 4.1: Impact Fee Comparison Table
City Water •Wastewater Drainage Transportation Total**
Austin*. $3,307.00 $1,852.00 $5;159.00
RBI belog(cuc rye'gat) $2L217�6T9_4�$17L47�1IAMIIIE$528KOMM$f4'. !02!$533.10 $3V552,83I
Lockhart $1;223.96 $1,094.33 $0 00 $819.00 $2,318.29.
New Braunfels* $2,311.00 $1,570.00 $1,500.00 $3,881:00
San Marcos* $2,466.00 $2,185.00 $4,651.00
SAWS $3,510.00 $3,174.00 $2,587.50 $9,271.50
Schertz* $4,240.00 $3,468.00 part of water fee $7,708.00
Seguin . . . $1,919 00 $2,374.00 $500.00 $4,793.00
*City is in the process of updating its impact fees
**Cumulative total of Water,Wastewater,and Drainage fees only
4.2 Steps for Adoption
The following timeline describes the notice, public hearing, timing, and sequence requirements
found in LGC Chapter 395 for an updateto an impact fee schedule.
1) Establish a local capital improvements plan (CIP). — Section 395.0411 - CIP must be
developed by qualified professionals using generally accepted engineering and planning
practices whichincludeestablishing service area boundaries and land-use assumption
(LUA).
2) Land-use assumptions, CIP and proposed amended impact fees must be made
publicly available before publication of the first public hearing date. — Section
395:054— On or before the date of the first publication of the notice of the hearing on the
amendments, the land use assumptions and the capital improvements plan, including
the amount of any proposed amended impact fee per service unit, shall be made
available to the public.
Page 15
City of Cibolo July 1,2013
Impact Fee Study 2013 Update-Water,Wastewater, Drainage,Transportation
3) Set date for public hearing to consider the update to LUA and CIP for the
designated service area within 60 days of receiving update. —Section 395.053
4) Publish and send notice of public hearing on LUA and CIP at least 30 days before
hearing. — Section 395.055—Notice of hearing must be sent by certified mailto anyone
who has requested in writing within the previous two years that notice be provided.
5) Advisory Committee Comments on Amendments — Section 395.056— The advisory
committee created under Section 395.058 shall file its written comments on the
proposed amendments to the land use assumptions, capital improvements plan, and the
impact fee before the fifth business day before the date of the public hearing on the
amendments.
6) Conduct public hearing. — Section 395.054— On or before date of hearing, five-person
advisory committee must be appointed.
7) Approval of Amendments Required — Section 395.057- Amendments of the land use
assumptions, the capital improvements plan, and modification of the impact fee mustbe
approved or disapproved within 30 days after the date of the public hearing on the
amendments.
Page 16
City of Cibolo July 1,2013
Impact Fee Study 2013 Update-Water,Wastewater, Drainage, Transportation:.
Appendix A.— Future Land Use Assumptions Map
A
II--
,., EM,
FUTURE THOROUGHFARE WIDTH,TYPE
FUTURE LAND USE
\\nD.u.EaoE,nwro:ouv
,ds
ISI:
f :i,�l r•_ t rt ,g 111111MED uc'x w,cE
r
l t.
� ®,� l
-- , -
ems
1
EE 1-_ i _I j
r7 I
I - - I •
o
® 1 . .) la .r
ee—AE
. \\. 4,,
gr
,t1.4 Ain
i_,n IliM 1311
•
FUTURE LAND USE et%
ASSUMPTIONS MAP o 1.000 DOD ..� •
RPS Espey CITY OF CIBOLO,TEXAS ®FeelF.*
.�,,. ,
.ew.om o,e mn:o:.,y aamm, ., MAY11,2013 �y yEYvx�•
City of Cibolo July 1,2013
Impact Fee Study 2013 Update-Water,Wastewater, Drainage, Transportation
Appendix B - Project Maps
Exhibit 1 —Future Water System Improvements and Future Land Use Assumptions Map
Exhibit 2— Future Wastewater System Improvements and Future Land Use Assumptions Map
Exhibit 3— Future Drainage System Improvements and Future Land Use Assumptions Map
Exhibit 4—Future Transportation System Improvements and Future Land Use Assumptions
Map
B
u bcl �J
. . ;i j,- EXISTING 1.25 MG ELEVATED EXISTING 1 25 MG ELEVATED
" .� ,,,r 1 STORAGE TANK&1.0 MG STORAGE TANK&.FUTURE 75 MG
�. � ' . a; GROUND STORAGE TANK GROUND STORAGE TANK
J1IiI
3 v -x' - ' ._ 1pREEN VALLEY RD\
+'r
7 .=,, .....•
o H'20-W21
r T
WIEDN ER RD 3
LIVE OAK RDA ow
\ rn
m
O A Q03 O
r t'J„, O
t y o Ir
70
J - 90O�0_p RO
r--
FM 11031
.ry \ \ : W16 crl
WI 7
W 118
y�
4?
FM 1B Z > mo
fi,. H
WI3A \\13B •
•
pFF/RD ❑
•. /. • \Wl4 1 !•
•
ott CI
LU
•
W
••• M Q
;,r
Fa U_
Wi\ \\5R
(-u
W
II U m `.__
....
n
....
\\6 <
p
„..,.
r
m
A
O
3.
1 I---a
L_
\V7 —
I. IW
�
_ FUTURE 1.25 MG
•
• ELEVATED STORAGE TANK
- 1 63 I r _
LEGEND
EJClbolo City Limits # 0 1 O
CIWater service Area (p
• PRV STATION '
I Gum/Rp
44 TANK '•••••••
WATER LINE I \_\
t. EXISTING O
FUTURE L...... LI-' ...'.
__Li '
500,moo 2 000FUTURE WATER SYSTEM MAP
RPS Es p ey WATER IMPACT FEE STUDY
CIBOLO,TEXAS
JULY 2013 PROJECT#13001 00
vacw.uom YX1CIP StA+GSu.me00e00exh_Fuw,a rrma,d v.Ier_wo mm
0 r........"
I
-:--- i,iii.„ .. , , ,
,,, ___.
„C17
,i,,_:, ,,,
5r
i_., „. :,,_4. ,.„. ,:„.,,,,,,
,....___ 9L,4 /4"'`,1:•''' --•
)1t,
L
\VN
V.6. GREEN VALLEY RD
i ♦
�T[[[/ WIEDNERRD
1 ....1i ....
_
D
r—
o
` �• L
�.�. I•�.� ,�FN=101. D O
•,y n
w .
1:
♦ o J
i
N
1.i L
•M.e
•11+\112 11\1.1;.1 Pi
fr 1 11.its
O* --1 _ •tq
t \001511m
�J _
rn
•
I 1 .•..,••..�
i N‘NI,15( _
a NIs
\N".14:\//A\
AA 14C /
_ Legend
wastewater Planning Area
Eil ® (oyPfR'sFCO,N • WJV MANHOLE
RO
�^• •❑ LIFT STATION
' ----______.,, EXISTING WASTEWATER LINE
r Q b— -1--r
' ••►PROPOSED WAN FORCE MAIN
n---, ■••PROPOSED VAN GRAVITY MAIN
0 1250 2,500 FUTURE WASTEWATER SYSTEM MAP
R PS Espey � WASTEWATER IMPACT FEE STUDY
Feet CIBOLO,TEXAS
JULY 2013 PROJECT#13001 OC
P\actm40305000P5W00I9.1No00' .5 FWn WX_SSGam M•Pmma
Legend
nCibolo City Limits
® n Town Creek Watershed
1 V/7jj Drainage CIP Project
TII r
—
ri --- --',..,W.4,W;II,..:7 j __1
-p. `-
` , j 1
1 1
6 1,4 t
bTo reek Watershed _.. ,
qT
I i p -
O ---
Dietz Creek 1 a n _-
3
Watershed ?_
FM 1103 -) '...1 , I
• 78 a
r,,, i,1•
I Santa Clara
a5r^� �,. Watershed
70
1
0 D6 ti
t
Wo a
o
/ -...\\..."............. -- _ ,, ..,,,,,,A1..:,_:.H.:-,,,,,,Fiii,.. ::_::
G.-.Z
0 E73 CowerSegV'
�Y
I
Ll et
p11j
` vi f
11
0
IIMP C 13
......JT:1 1/4,......,...
aoJ . ,, (i..-___
a
FUTURE DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS
a toxo zmo 400 DRAINAGE IMPACT FEE STUDY
RPS Espey 0 CIBOLO,TEXAS
JULY 2013 PROJECT#13001 00
Mavtre4.4010500 OP 9ud101510014030-• an furore Oranage System Wpmaa
37
*40
l___________I `r 38
1 T
35A L0
35B GREEN VALLEY RD t 35D
`,,, 3
m O. WIEDNER RD i
(LIVE OAK RD O z,3t�P � ill_________
o 34B S;.
C_ r
`> m 4 T'
o r X.'
m s N
N 0 O i�
HI
tIr
E�O R c- ..
'G 17 t I ?` t
iliti ,,,,-.1./ r-- ._,...i r,11-Lia / ......J , ., _ .,,,
4
r.
A
PFFi r aim
ij
.)
e5 v �M >8 l 1 ", ,,
1.0 At
07 I 'Too�ti"4 i;ate s
r r
m Z00� x I Lt
n +s Y...4'
Q O ii `t't .� .. s ._..
m
'a�F=
I—c m
O ,
i ;.mss,..,.`
Ind, \ •' V
n 3.
7/ 8
— per - COwfRS 00 ', ...�.�...,. -: t.
50 .,�
o
0
,. c, ".,
�: —L
1 —
'i 4 —
‘
--.:4/ 72 BOLTON RD / r1
l'--,,,,. C
4* j D
�
----i
M.
LEGEND ,-.....---,t,,-.....---,t, °
4:`�" o ---z-
Cibolo City Limits .___.________.___
3 r
• Traffic Signals w
0500FUTURE TRANSPORTATION PROJECT MAP0 1,750
�
TRANSPORCBO O^TEXASFEE STUDY
RPS Espey
JULY 2013 PROJECT#13001 00
FW.t+e1.03050D OP 9u0/IGISe0,4030-51:1Oem furore Wmana Warer_Map ma.
City of Cibolo July 1,2013
Impact Fee Study 2013 Update—Water,Wastewater, Drainage,Transportation
Appendix C — Impact Fee Tables
Water Capital Improvement Projects
Wastewater Capital IImprovement Projects
Drainage Capital Improvement Projects
Transportation Capital Improvement Projects
C
Impact Fee Study July 2013 City of Cibolo
CITY OF CIBOLO
Water Capital Improvment Projects
Length(LI?)
(or other Finance Costs
specified Construction ROW/Easement Engineering/Surveying T Adjusted Rate allowable under
Project Number Location . Improvement Type quantity) . Cost Contingency Acquisition Permitting costs , for 2013-2014 LGC§395 Total Costs
WI Main Street(WIC-WIE) . . 12"Pipeline. . 8,484 ..$668,115 .$120,261 .$26,293 $167,029 $1,150,940 $650,280. $1,801,000
'W2 Red River(Aquavista) .. 12"Pipeline .. 2,300.. $181,125 $32,603 $7,128 . . $45,281' $312,020 $176,000 ,$488,000
U W4 FM 78/Pfeil Road 12"Pipeline 9,750 . $767,813 $138,206. .. $30,217. . $191,953 $1;322,690 $747,000 $2,070,000
W5 Schaefer Road(W5B) 12"Pipeline 2,632 $207,270 $37,309 $8,157 $51,818 $357,060 $202,000 $559,000
N ..
ao W6 Greenbelt 12"Pipeline 2,850 $224,438 $40,399 $8,833 .$56,109 $386,630 $218,000' $605,000-'
N W7 Arizpe Road 12"Pipeline 2,850 $224,438 $40,399 $8,833 $56,109 $386,630 $218,000 $605,000
c W11 High School East 16"Pipeline 3,000 $283,500 $51,030 $9,298' $70,875 $486,200 $275,000 $761,000
W I2 High School South(N-S) 16"Pipeline 3,400 $321,300 $57,834 $10,537 $80,325 $551,020 $311,000 $862,000
1 W13 High School South(E-W) 12"Pipeline 4,000 $315,000 $56,700 $12,397 $78,750 $542,640 $307,000 $850,000
E W14 . Higlt School South(E-W Deadend) . 12"Pipeline . .2,300 $181,125 $32,603 .$7,128 . $45,281 . $312,020 . $176,000. .. $488,000 .
8 WI6 High School East PRV Station EA $31,500 .$5,670 $9,000 $7,875 $63,360 $36,000 . $99,000
c W17 .PM 1103 ' PRV Station. . EA . $31,500 . $5,670 $9,000 $7,875 $63,360 $36,000 $99,000,
W18 Main Street PRV Station EA $31,500 $5,670 . $9,000 $7,875 $63,360 $36,000 $99,000
'o W20 Northeast Cibolo .75 MG Ground Storage Tank L.S. $787,500 $141,750 $22,000 $196,875 $1;346,060 $761,000 $2,107,000
a W21. Northeast Cibolo .. . 1.25 MGD Pump Station . L.S. ., $600,000 .. $108,000 . $16,000 .. $150,000 . $1,024,680 $579,000 $1,604,000
W22 Wells Ranch Water Supply Project(1200AF Pump Station) L.S. $3,155,132 $567,924 . $0 $252,411 $4,660,840 $2,633,000 $7,294,000
10 Lower Seguin and Haeckerville Road Water Storage and Distribution(1.25 MGD EST L.S. $4,347,006 $782,461 $0 $347,760 $5,477,230 $3,094,630 $8,571,860
o N'& . 15 City-Wide Expand Available Water Resources L.S. $8,000,000 $1,440,000 . $0 $640,000 $10,080,000 $5,695,200 $15,775,200
f° 63 Southof FM 78 Water Receiving/Blending Station L.S. $1,149,139 $206,845 $0 $91,931 $1;447,920 $818,070 $2,265,990
Total Cost $44,738,060 "
Total LUES 12,366
Existing LUEs in Water Service Area 6,141
Total LUES attributable to growth 6,225
Initial Impact Fee Calculation $7,190
50%Credit $3,595
Water Impact Fee $3,595 previously$2,276.94
RPS Espey P:Wctive\1300I.00_Ciboto CIP_and_IF9tSpreadshmt\CPP_Prjects130711.xls
Impact Fee Study July 2013 City of Cibolo
CITY OF CIBOLO
Wastewater Capital Improvment Projects
Finance Costs
Length(LF) Engineering/ allowable
(or other specified ROW/Easement Surveying/ Adjusted Rate under LGC
Project Number Location/Description Improvement Type quantity) Construction Cost Contingency Acquisition Permitting costs for 2013-2014 §395 Total Costs
WW1 Town Creek Parallel Interceptor 30"Gravity Main 5,600 $911,400 $164,052 '$23,140 • $227,850 • $1,555,000 ' $879,000 $2,434,000
WW2 Town Creek West Parallel30"Gravity Main 5,950 $968,363 . $174,305 $24,587 $242,091 $1,652,000 $933,000 . $2,585,000
WW7 Town Creek East Fork(Weidner to GV) 15"Gravity Main 4,850 $724,590 $130,426 $20,041 $181,148 $1,238,000 $699,000 $1;937,000
III WW8 North Side FM 78 ' 30"Gravity Main 3,600 $585,900 $105,462' $14,876' $146,475 $1,000,000 $565,000 $1,565,000
rn WW9 Country Lane Force Main6"Force Main 4,800 $378,000 $68,040 $19,835 , $94,500 $657,000 $371,000- $1,028,000
NW W10 East System Lift Station(Country Ln at Tolle Rd) •Lift Station 1.14 MGD $672,000 $120,960 $9,000 ' $168,000 $1,137,000 $642,000 $1,779,000
o 'WWII East System Gravity Main 21"Gravity Main • ..7,600 $1,157,100 $208,278 ..$31,405 . . $289,275 • . $1,977,000 .$1,117,000 .$3,094,000
N WW12 Aqua Vista Force Main re-route 15"Gravity Main 600 $89,640 $16,135 $2,479 $22,410 $153,000 $86,000 $239,000
c WWI3 Southwest System Main(Schaffer Rd.to Lower Seguin Rd.) 21"Gravity Main 10,500 $1,598,625 $287,753 $43,388 ' .$399,656 $2,731,000 ' $1,543,000 $4,274,000
'k W W 14A Lift Station at Lower Seguin Rd and Cibolo Creek . Lift Station 1.4 MGD/2.4 MGD $787,500 $141,750 $9;000, $196,875 $1;331,000 $752,000 . $2,083,000
✓ ' WW14B Force Main parallel to Southwest System Main 8"Force Main" 12,500 $1,181,250 $212,625 $25,826 $295,313 $2,011,000 $1,136,000 $3,147,000
EW W15 Bison Ridge Lift Station improvements(CoC Portion) . . Wet well and pumps Additional 0.5 MGD $288,750 $51,975 $4,500 . $72,188 $489,000 $276,000. $765,000
u WW15A Schaffer Rd.East 8"Gravity Main 1,320 $193,600 $34,848 $5,455 $48,400 $331,000 $187,000 $518,000
4.65 WW15B Hackerville East • 15"Gravity Main 1,800 $268,920 ' $48,406 . $7,438 '$67,230 $460,000 $260,000 $720,000
5 •
W W 15C Arizpe Rd:East 15"Gravity Main 1,680 $250,992 $45,179 $6,942 $62,748 . .$429,000 $242,000 $671,000
P., WWI5D Lower Seguin East 15"Gravity Main • 2,040 $304,776 $54,860 $8;430 $76,194 $521,000 $294,000 $815,000
° WW16 Town Creek Fork East(Rustic Tr.) 8"Gravity Main 3,600 $504,000 $90,720 $14,876 $126,000 $862,000 $487,000 $1,349,000
W W 17 East GravityMain Eastern Extension near Pierson Ln 8"Gravity Main 3,840 $537,600 $96,768 $15,868 $134,400 $920,000 $520,000 $1,440,000
WWI8 Country Lane Gravity Line 8"Gravity Main 2,880 $403,200 $72,576 $11,901 $100,800 $690,000, $390,000 $1,080,000
WW19 South Side FM 78 across Haeckerville to Arizpe Rd. 15-24"Gravity Main 7,000 $1,102,500 $198,450 $28,926 $275,625 $1,882,000 $1,063,000 $2;945,000
3A Extend Sanitary Sewer along FM 78-from Main to Santa Clara Creek $883,068 $158,952 $0.00 $220,767 $1,262,788 $713,475 $1,976,262
G N& 3B Upgrade Sanitary Sewer along FM 78-from Niemitz Park to Dietz Creek • $928,247 • $167,085 $0.00 $232,062 $1;327,394 $749,977 $2,077;371
N . 4 Extend Sanitary Sewer Service South of FM 78 $3,233,909 $582,104 $0.00 $808;477 $4,624,490 $2,612,837 $7,237,327
r.
Total Cost $45,758,960
Total LUEs 21,817
Existing LUEs in.wastewater service area .8,906
Total LUEs attributable to growth 12,911
Initial Impact Fee Calculation $3,540
50%Credit $1,770
Wastewater Impact Fee $1,770 previously$747.19
RPS Espey P,\Active\13001.00 Cibolo_CIP_and_IFS\Spreadsheet\CIP_P jects1307I1 sls
Impact Fee Study July 2013 City of Cibolo
CITY OF CIBOLO
Drainage Capital Improvment Projects
Engineering/ Finance Costs
Project Construction ROW/Easement Surveying/ Adjusted Rate allowable under
Number Location Improvement Type Cost Contingency Acquisition Permitting costs for 2013-2014 LGC§395 Total Costs
,o N D6. Tolle Road Regional Detention Detention facility $734,788 $146,958 $937,500 $183,697 $2,331,024 $1,317,029 $3,648,053
0 o ru cu U D7 . Downstream Conveyance Land Acquisition $0 $0. $3,168,000 $221,760 $3,945,003 $2,228,927 . , $6,173,929,
1 Haeckerville Levee Flood Control $2,487,700 $497,540 $760,000 $373,155 $2,326,893 $6,445,288
A
N U
7B Tolle Road Drainage Improvements II Drainage Improvements $3,265,192 $653,038 $0 $489,779 $2,490,525 $6,898,534
r" 18 Town Creek East Phase II Channelization $7,223,963 $1,444,793 $0 $1,083,594 $5,510,078 $15,262,428
Total Cost $38,428,233
Total LUEs 18,918
.Existing LUEs in Drainage Service Area 5,237
Total LUEs attributable to growth 13,681
Initial Impact Fee Calculation,based on benefit to existing and future LUEs $2,030
50%Credit $1,015
Drainage Impact Fee $1,015 previously$528.70
RPS Espey P:\Active\13001.00_Cibolo_CIP_and IFS\Spreadsheet\CIP_Projects130711.xls
Impact Fee Study July 2013 City of Cibolo
CITY OF CIBOLO
Transportation Capital Improvment Projects
Length(LF)
(or other specified
Project Number 2012 CIP ., LocntioirlDescription
Improvement Type quantity) _ Road Type .. Total Costs
Widening to full buildout(4 lanes)between Scherz&Main Street,including Dobie Creek
bridge widening . .. ..5825 . 86 $: . 8,391,338
CIP 12 5 Borgfeld Road _ $ 369,340
CIP 17 58 FM 1103 at New Haeckerville Road extension Traffic signal @ FMl 103 West of High School $ 369,340
CIP 23 Cibolo Valley Drive at Borgfeld Road Traffic signal @ Cibolo Valley Drive&Borgfeld 1476 . 86 $ 2,098,820
- .
CIP 28 . 25 Weidner Road Phase 1 ROW acquisition,New Street Section,from Gatewood Entrance to FM 1103
Realignment,ROW acquisition,New Street Section, from Town Creek Road to Dean Rd
fli CIP 34A 43&26 Weidner Road Phase 2
Extension(Town Creek Crossing) 3407 66 $ 3,167,970
Realignment,ROW acquisition,New Street Section,from Dean Rd Extension to Gatewood
p„ N CII'34B 43&26 Weidner Road Phase 3 Entrance 2910 86 $ 4,578,165
U CIP 35A 17B Green Valley Road Widen Green Valley Road to 4 lanes west of FM 1103 1748 86 $ 2,390,473
oN CIP 35B 17A Green Valley Road-Town Creek Crossing CrossTown Creek West floodplain on Green Valley Road(Culverts)
803 $ 1,877,73.1
N Widen to 86'ROW&Pavement Standard,in concert with req traffic improvements being
CI'35C 23 Green Valley Road installed at Enclave of Turning Stone,Heights of Cibolo and Landmark Pointe 1997 86 5- 2,637,228
z CIP 35D 17B Green Valley Road Widen Green Valley Road to 4 lanes west of FM 1103 8089 86 $: 10,937,863
CIP 37 I11-35 at Wiederstein
Traffic signal $ 689,507
. . ..
CI'38 31 Cibolo Valley Drive at Old Wiederstein Traffic signal - $ 809,638- $ 809,638
CIP 39 57 FM 78 at Main Street Traffic signal
CIP 40 Cibolo Valley Drive . Traffic signal $. . 516,106
CIP 46 Town Creekway to FM 78/Haeckerville Road Roadway extension-New alignment FM 1103 to Tolle Rd 1670 86 $ 3,283,584
U FM 1103 between Old Wiederstein and Green Valley ROW acquisition,Environmental Study,currently 120'ROW 5794 • 150 $ 2,715,904
CIP 51 5048 150 $ 410,252
o' CT 52A FM 1103 between Weidner and FM 78 ROW acquisition,Environmental Study,currently 120'ROW
N
CIP 52B FM 1103 between Weidner and FM 78 New ROW acquisition,Environmental Study, 8914 150. $ 3,144,655
400 66 $ 2,058,435
CII'D5 1 Haeckerville Road Bridge Bridge over Town Creek $ 335,609
CIP'39 57 FM 78 at Main StreTraffic sinal .. - ..et g 1951 86 $ 2,847,444
CIP 44 65 ' South Main Street to West Schaefer Road Roadway extension 3052 66 $ '2,847,444
U 0 CIP 45 65 West Schaefer Road to South Main Street Roadway extension 302 66 $ 12,775,522
N N CIP 47A 8&1 Haeckerville Road from FM 78 Roadway extension-From FM 1103 to Arizpe Rd
CIP 47B 8&1 Haeckerville Road from FM 78 Lower Seguin Rd,potentially to include the realignment of the intersection of Haeckerville& 3912 86 $ 5,335,785
c o CII'50 19 FM 1103 from FM 78 to I-10 .. New ROW acquisition 24312 .. 150 $ 2,898,823-
VI N • NewBrid a 638 86 $ 2,258,104
CT 76 32 Lower Seguin Phase I-Bridge dge 8 23430 86 $ 32,009,320
CIF'71 8&32 Lower Seguin Phase II-Road New Street Section
CII'72
66• Bolton Road New Street Section 14562 86 $- 19,981,791
North South Total
$ 48,723,524 $ 86,467,682 $135,191,206
Total Cost 35981 29008 64,988
Total LUEs13619 6694 20,313
Existing LUES in transportation area 23619 26694 20,313
Total LUEs attributable to growth $2,362 22380 4,676'
Initial Impact Fee Caldulation
$1,090 $1,940 $3,030
50%Credit $1,090 $1,940 $3,030
Transportation Impact Fee
Previously $ 1,464.02 $ 533.10 $ 1,997.12
P:'Active\13001.00 Cibolo_CIP_and_IFS\Spreadsheet\CtP_Projects130711.xls
RPS Espey
City of Cibolo July 1,2013
ImpactFeeStudy 2013 Update—Water,Wastewater, Drainage,Transportation
Appendix D — Digital Data
D